JAYSON ARDILA
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a conflict exists between the written sentence and the trial court's oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement prevails and the written judgment must be amended accordingly.
[1] When a conflict exists between a trial court's written sentence and its oral pronouncement of sentence, the oral pronouncement controls and the written judgment must be a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Thus, when conflict arises between the written sentence and the [trial court's] oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement prevails.”
The court cited Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003) to establish the rule that oral pronouncements control over written sentences when they conflict.
Jayson Ardila entered an open guilty plea to charged offenses in two cases in Seminole County Circuit Court and received a sentence that included five…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Clerical Error Correction cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2610 L.T. Case Nos. 2022-CF-001852-A 2022-CF-002230-A
JAYSON ARDILA, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. Jessica Recksiedler, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kurt Koehler, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
October 16, 2026
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal proceeding under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following Appellant's open, guilty plea to the charged offenses. However, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter an amended judgment to correct a clerical error in the written sentence on Case No. 2022-CF-002230-A to show that
Appellant was sentenced to five (5) years in prison on count two. See Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003) (“Thus, when conflict arises between the written sentence and the [trial court's] oral pronouncement, the oral pronouncement prevails.").
AFFIRMED, REMANDED with directions.
SOUD, BOATWRIGHT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Columbus Rickey Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 2003)