THOMAS JUANTE BURDINE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2026-10-16
No. 2025-2202
Floyd, J., Makar, J., Soud, J., MacIver, J.
2026 FL 13967 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's imposition of investigative costs must be orally pronounced at sentencing to be valid.


Headnotes

[1] Investigative costs imposed as part of a criminal sentence must be orally pronounced at sentencing to be valid; costs not orally pronounced must be struck from the judgme…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“reversing with directions to correct an order to remove investigative costs that were not orally pronounced”

The court cited Rogers v. State, 289 So. 3d 548, 549–50 (Fla. 2020), for the principle that investigative costs not orally pronounced must be removed.

Facts & Procedural History

Thomas Juante Burdine was convicted and sentenced in Duval County. The trial court imposed a $50 cost of investigation as part of the sentence.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2025-2202 L.T. Case No. 16-2025-MM-2843-A

THOMAS JUANTE BURDINE, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. Mose Levon Floyd, Judge.

Charlie Cofer, Public Defender, and Elizabeth Hogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Darcy Townsend, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

October 16, 2026

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $50 cost of investigation as the cost of investigation was not orally pronounced at sentencing. See Rogers v. State, 289

So. 3d 548, 549–50 (Fla. 2020) (reversing with directions to correct an order to remove investigative costs that were not orally pronounced).

AFFIRMED; and REMANDED with instructions.

MAKAR, SOUD, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw