JAMEL M. ROSEAU
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's denial of a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed when the motion lacks sufficient grounds for relief.
Jamel Roseau, proceeding pro se, appealed the denial of his rule 3.850 motion in four consolidated criminal cases from Palm Beach County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMEL M. ROSEAU, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-1882 [October 15, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott Suskauer, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502020CF006623AXXXMB; 502020CF009782AXXXXMB; 502021CF007853AXXXMB; 502023CF007501AXXXMB.
Jamel Roseau, Live Oak, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, KLINGENSMITH and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *