ALLOY LEWIN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-10-14
No. 2026-0432
Mastrarrigo, J., Forst, J., Shepherd, J., Lott, J.
2026 FL 13784 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A petition for writ of habeas corpus that is unauthorized and frivolous must be dismissed.


Headnotes

[1] A pro se litigant who files an unauthorized and frivolous petition for writ of habeas corpus may be subject to sanctions including a bar on pro se filing or referral to p…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Alloy Lewin, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court for Broward County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALLOY LEWIN, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0432 [October 14, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lorena V. Mastrarrigo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062000CF005384A88810.

Alloy Lewin, Cross City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order dismissing appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). The petition is unauthorized and frivolous. Appellant is cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, and/or frivolous filing may result in sanctions, such as a bar on pro se filing in this court or referral to prison officials for disciplinary procedures, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999); § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2025).

Affirmed.

FORST, SHEPHERD and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw