WILLIAM E. SCHILDGEN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural mechanism for raising claims of error under Apprendi and its progeny.
[1] Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural vehicle for raising a claim of sentencing error under Apprendi and its progeny.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliam E. Schildgen appealed from a criminal conviction and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court for Lee County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800(A) Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-0607 Lower Tribunal No. 2019-CF-14374
WILLIAM E. SCHILDGEN,
Appellant, v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County. Bruce Kyle, Judge.
October 9, 2026
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Maye v. State, 436 So. 3d 416, 418 (Fla. 2026), reh'g denied, No. SC2023-1184, 2026 WL 2243835 (Fla. Aug. 4, 2026) (“[R]ule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for raising a claim of error under Apprendi and its progeny. . . .”). NARDELLA, WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur. William E. Schildgen, Blountstown, pro se. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Frances Muir, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED