ROCCO SANTOMENNO
v.
THE ESTATE OF EDITH SANTOMENNO, GLADYS WADE, JOHN SANTOMENNO, JOHN SANTOMENNO, JR.

Fla. 5th DCA | 2026-10-09
No. 2025-0835
Gaustad, J., Jay, C.J., Soud, J., Boatwright, J.
2026 FL 13542 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Trial courts lack discretion to refuse to appoint a person as personal representative named in the will unless that person is disqualified by law or exceptional circumstances exist, in which case the court may consider the person's character, ability, and experience.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court lacks discretion to refuse to appoint a person as personal representative named in a will unless that person is disqualified by law, and only in exceptional…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The general rule of law is that trial courts do not have discretion to refuse to appoint a person as representative named by the testator in the will unless that person is disqualified by law. . . . Only in exceptional circumstances does a court have the discretion to refuse to appoint a person as personal representative who was named in the decedent's will.”

The court cited Hernandez v. Hernandez to establish the standard governing appointment of personal representatives named in wills.

Facts & Procedural History

Rocco Santomenno appealed a circuit court decision regarding the appointment of a personal representative for the Estate of Edith Santomenno, with Gla…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case Nos. 5D2025-0835 5D2025-2594 LT Case No. 18-2024-CP-400

ROCCO SANTOMENNO, Appellant,

V.

THE ESTATE OF EDITH

SANTOMENNO, GLADYS WADE,

JOHN SANTOMENNO, JOHN

SANTOMENNO, JR., Appellees.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County. Linda L. Gaustad, Judge.

Robert (Tad) Drean, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A., Lakewood Ranch, for Appellant.

Ronald A. Hertel, of Hertel Legal PLLC, Ormond Beach, for Appellee, John Santomenno, Jr.

No Appearance for Remaining Appellees.

October 9, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hernandez v. Hernandez, 946 So. 2d 124, 126-27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The general rule of law is that trial courts do not have discretion to refuse to appoint a person as representative named by the testator in the will unless that person is disqualified by law. . . . Only in exceptional circumstances does a court have the discretion to refuse to appoint a person as personal representative who was named in the decedent's will. . . . In making a decision, the circuit court may consider the person's character, ability, and experience to serve as personal representative and may refuse to appoint the preferred person if the record supports its conclusion that the person lacks the necessary qualities.")

JAY, C.J., and SOUD and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw