BRIAN E. ROBERTS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's denial of a Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed when the motion lacks sufficient grounds for relief.
Brian E. Roberts appealed from an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion filed in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BRIAN E. ROBERTS, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-0783
[October 8, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 561992CF001817AXXXXX.
Robert C. Stone of Robert C. Stone, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *