JACKSON E. PRIDEMORE, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-10-08
No. 2026-0300
Coates, Jr., J., Forst, J., Klingensmith, J., Shaw, J.
2026 FL 13485 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court's denial of a Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed when the motion lacks sufficient grounds for post-conviction relief.


Facts & Procedural History

Jackson Pridemore appealed a trial court's order denying his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief in a criminal case from Palm Beach County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACKSON PRIDEMORE, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0300

[October 8, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 502017CF008009AXXXMB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Danielle Forté, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, KLINGENSMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw