CARLYNE DESIR AND FLINT EDWARDS
v.
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellants' failure to timely challenge orders entered before the September 2025 post-final-judgment enforcement order deprives the court of jurisdiction to review them, and issues not adequately briefed are deemed waived.
[1] Issues not adequately briefed in an appellate brief, where arguments are merely referenced without further elucidation, are deemed waived and cannot be reviewed on appeal…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCarlyne Desir and Flint Edwards appealed from a circuit court order involving collateral surrender in a case against BMO Harris Bank N.A. in Osceola C…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Issues cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-2361 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-003244
CARLYNE DESIR and FLINT EDWARDS, Appellants,
v.
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Christine E. Arendas, Judge.
October 2, 2026
PER CURIAM.
We lack jurisdiction to review any orders or judgments entered before the trial court's September 2025 post-final-judgment enforcement order involving the surrender of collateral because Appellants did not timely challenge them. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). We otherwise affirm. See Duest v. Dugger, 555 So. 2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) ("The purpose of an appellate brief is to present arguments in support of the points on appeal. Merely making reference to arguments below without further elucidation does not suffice to preserve issues, and these claims are deemed to have been waived.").
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Carlyne Desir and Flint Edwards, Riverview, Pro Se.
Kevin P. Robinson, Bradley J. Anderson, and Austin A. Esposito, of Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2