HUMBERTO ABREU
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment without deciding whether the smell of cannabis alone is sufficient to establish probable cause.
“We have no occasion to address [whether the smell of cannabis alone is sufficient to establish probable cause] because this case does not involve smell alone.”
The court explained why it was not deciding the constitutional question presented on appeal.
Humberto Abreu appealed a criminal conviction from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Probable Cause Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-2028 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CF-001876 HUMBERTO ABREU, Appellant, V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Lisa S. Porter, Judge.
October 2, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Simpson, 414 So. 3d 291, 297 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) ("We have no occasion to address [whether the smell of cannabis alone is sufficient to establish probable cause] because this case does not involve smell alone."). MIZE, BROWNLEE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur. Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender Bartow, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah Sclavakis, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED