WILLIS A. SMITH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
v.
KEATHLEY, ESTATE OF PHILIP S. KEATHLEY, ET AL

Fla. 2d DCA | 2026-09-30
No. 2026-0020
Frayman, J., LaRose, J., Morris, J., LaBrit, J.
2026 FL 12753 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was affirmed on the merits.


Facts & Procedural History

Willis A. Smith Construction, Inc. brought an action against Debra Keathley, as personal representative of the Estate of Philip S. Keathley, and the B…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIS A. SMITH CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant,

V.

DEBRA KEATHLEY, as personal representative of the Estate of Philip S. Keathley a/k/a Scott Keathley, deceased, and the

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH

FLORIDA d/b/a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, Appellees.

No. 2D2026-0020

September 30, 2026

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Evan G. Frayman, Judge.

Michael R. D'Lugo and Andrew Willers of Wicker Smith O'Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Shea T. Moxon and Thomas J. Seider of Brannock Berman & Seider, Tampa, and Matthew M. Thomas of Graves Thomas Injury Law Group, P.A., Vero Beach, for Appellee Debra Keathley.

No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, MORRIS, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw