KURT ENDELMANN, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GLADYS DEPAOLO
v.
STEPHEN P. HEUSTON, ESQ., AND HEUSTON LEGAL, PLLC,

Fla. 6th DCA | 2026-09-29
No. 2024-2056
Young, J., Stargel, J., Mize, J., Pratt, J.
2026 FL 12670 Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment in favor of the attorney defendants was affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Kurt Endelmann, as personal representative of the estate of Gladys DePaolo, appealed a judgment against him in a case involving Stephen P. Heuston, Es…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 6D2024-2056 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CP-000211 KURT ENDELMANN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF GLADYS DEPAOLO, Appellant, V.

STEPHEN P. HEUSTON, ESQ., and HEUSTON LEGAL, PLLC, Appellees. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Tom Young, Judge.

September 29, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, MIZE and PRATT, JJ., concur.

Lisa C. McCrystal and Margaret A. Wharton, of Wharton Law Group, P.A., Oviedo, for Appellant. Scott A. Beatty, of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Naples, and Austin R. Payne, of Heuston Legal, PLLC, Melbourne, for Appellees. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw