M. M.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's order in the dependency proceeding was affirmed.
This case involves four children (Ky.M., Ne.M., Na.M., and Ke.M.) and an appeal by M.M. from a circuit court order in a dependency matter.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dependency Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2026-1003 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-DP-000138
In the Interest of Ky.M., Ne.M., Na.M., and Ke.M., children.
M.M., Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM OFFICE, Appellees.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. Tom Young, Judge.
September 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and GANNAM and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Keith Peterson, of Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant.
Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel, of Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee, Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, of Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office.