DANILO MARTORANO
v.
BARBARA ALFANO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When an appellant fails to provide a proper record to the reviewing court, the trial court's judgment is presumed correct and will be affirmed unless it is fundamentally erroneous.
[1] An appellant's failure to provide a proper record to the appellate court is fatal to the appellant's claims, and a trial court judgment that is not fundamentally erroneou…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The appellant has the burden of providing a proper record to the reviewing court, and the failure to do so is 'usually fatal' to the appellant's claims.”
Court citing Esaw v. Esaw and Casella v. Casella regarding the burden on appellants to provide adequate records.
This is a family law matter (case number indicates domestic relations) between Danilo Martorano and Barbara Alfano. The trial court entered a judgment…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Without Transcript cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-1032 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-DR-007654-O
DANILO MARTORANO, Appellant,
V.
BARBARA ALFANO, Appellee.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Craig A. McCarthy, Judge.
September 25, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (quoting Casella v. Casella, 569 So. 2d 848, 849 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“The appellant has the burden of providing a proper record to the reviewing court, and the failure to do so is 'usually fatal' to the appellant's claims.")); Engesser v. Engesser, 42 So. 3d 249, 250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979) (“A trial court's ruling is presumed correct, and when no
transcript is provided, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous will be affirmed.")).
STARGEL, WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.
Lisa R. Patten, of Patten Law Firm, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant.
Carol B. Shannin and Nicholas A. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
- Casella v. Casella, 569 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
- Engesser v. Engesser, 42 So. 3d 249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)