MONTEVILLA AT BARTRAM LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
LENNAR HOMES, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant's brief that leaves gaps requiring the court to rebrief the appeal is insufficient, warranting affirmance.
[1] An appellant's brief that contains gaps requiring the court to rebrief the appeal fails to present sufficient arguments and will result in affirmance of the trial court j…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“If the gaps left by an initial brief would require the court to rebrief the appeal, the argument is insufficient, and we will affirm on that basis.”
Court's citation to Ford Motor Co. v. Hetsler, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D1582 (Fla. 5th DCA July 31, 2026)
Montevilla at Bartram Lakes Association, Inc. appealed a circuit court judgment in Duval County involving a dispute with Lennar Homes, LLC.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-1359 LT Case No. 16-2022-CA-4203
MONTEVILLA AT BARTRAM LAKES
ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant,
V.
LENNAR HOMES, LLC, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, III, Judge.
Michael J. Korn, of Korn & Zehmer, P.A., Jacksonville, and Barry B. Ansbacher, and Michael C. Feinberg, and John S. Pairitz, of Ansbacher Law, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Peter D. Webster, of Carlton Fields, P.A., Tallahassee, and Dara L. Lindquist, of Carlton Fields, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
September 25, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ford Motor Co. v. Hetsler, 51 Fla. L. Weekly D1582 (Fla. 5th DCA July 31, 2026) (“If the gaps left by an initial brief would require the court to rebrief the appeal, the argument is insufficient, and we will affirm on that basis.").
JAY, C.J., and EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.