JAMAL RUTLEDGE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied the defendant's rule 3.800 motion.
Jamal James Rutledge appealed an order denying his rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule 3.800 Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JAMAL JAMES RUTLEDGE, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2026-1860 [September 24, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 062018CF000988A88810.
Jamal James Rutledge, Live Oak, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, CIKLIN and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *