GABLES INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
v.
SHOMA CORAL GABLES, LLC, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's denial of post-trial motions for remittitur and new trial is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.
[1] A trial court's denial of post-trial motions for remittitur and new trial is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[W]e review the trial court's denial of . . . post-trial motions for remittitur and new trial under the abuse of discretion standard.”
The court cited R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schleider, 273 So. 3d 63, 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) to establish the standard of review.
Gables Investment Holdings, LLC appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in a case against Shoma Coral Gables, LLC.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 24, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-1203 Lower Tribunal No. 16-2102-CA-01
Gables Investment Holdings, LLC, Appellant,
vs.
Shoma Coral Gables, LLC, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge.
Burstyn Law PLLC, and Sean A. Burstyn and Todd R. Friedman; Dorta Law, and Gonzalo Dorta; Crabtree Auslander & Tackenberg, LLC, and John G. Crabtree, Charles M. Auslander, and Brian C. Tackenberg, for appellant.
White & Case LLP, and Raoul G. Cantero, James N. Robinson, Zachary B. Dickens, and David W. Rifkin, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schleider, 273 So. 3d 63, 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“[W]e review the trial court's denial of . . . post-trial motions for remittitur and new trial under the abuse of discretion standard.” (quoting Maggolc, Inc. v. Roberson, 116 So. 3d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013))).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Maggolc, Inc. v. Roberson, 116 So. 3d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Schleider, 273 So. 3d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)