DREW
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel.
[1] A criminal defendant generally cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel”
Court's citation to Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)
Charlie Drew filed a petition for writ of prohibition while represented by counsel.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Prohibition cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2026-1221
CHARLIE DREW, Petitioner,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Proceedings.
September 23, 2026
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses the petition as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that, generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.