SIMMONS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant's request for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in a plea bargain is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.801.
[1] A defendant's request for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in a plea bargain is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.801.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJermaine R. Simmons appealed from a circuit court decision denying his request for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in his plea bargain.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.801 cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
JERMAINE R. SIMMONS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 1D2025-2625
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
September 23, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's request for jail credit beyond the amount agreed to in his plea bargain is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.801. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1052 (Fla. 2011); Ancrum v. State, 281 So. 3d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019).
AFFIRMED.
KELSEY, LONG, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)
- Ancrum v. State, 281 So. 3d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)