STEPHAN LABOY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural mechanism for raising claims of sentencing error under Apprendi and its progeny, including Alleyne.
[1] Rule 3.800(a) is not the proper procedural vehicle for raising claims of sentencing error under Apprendi v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[R]ule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for raising a claim of error under Apprendi and its progeny, including Alleyne.”
Court's holding citing Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, S116 (Fla. May 14, 2026)
Stephan Laboy appealed from a circuit court decision in Osceola County, raising sentencing-related claims.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-1590 Lower Tribunal No. 2007-CF-002243
STEPHAN LABOY, Appellant,
V. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Osceola County. John D.W. Beamer, Judge.
September 18, 2026
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Maye v. State, 51 Fla. L. Weekly S116, S116 (Fla. May 14, 2026) ("[R]ule 3.800(a) is not the proper vehicle for raising a claim of error under Apprendi and its progeny, including Alleyne."). MIZE, BROWNLEE and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur. Stephan Laboy, Bowling Green, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED