STEPHANIE R. LAOS
v.
BENTLEY LUXURY LIVING, LLC D/B/A THE BENTLEY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's judgment when the appellant fails to provide a record of the trial proceedings.
[1] An appellant's failure to provide a complete record of trial proceedings precludes appellate review of whether the trial court's judgment is supported by the evidence or…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, this appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
The court cited Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee to explain why it could not review the trial court's judgment.
Stephanie R. Laos appealed a judgment entered by the County Court for Orange County against her in a case involving Bentley Luxury Living, LLC d/b/a T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-0213 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CC-023189
STEPHANIE R. LAOS, Appellant,
v.
BENTLEY LUXURY LIVING, LLC d/b/a THE BENTLEY, Appellee.
Appeal from the County Court for Orange County. Carly S. Wish, Judge.
July 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, this appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").
NARDELLA, WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Byron Acosta, of Law Office of Byron Acosta, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
James I. Barron, III, of James I. Barron, III, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
2