UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
REESE F. KING AND JANICE A. KING
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An insured is entitled to recover the replacement cost value of their loss under an insurance policy.
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company issued a property insurance policy to Reese F. King and Janice A. King. The Kings filed a claim for re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Replacement Cost cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2024-0241 Lower Tribunal No. 19-CA-1808
UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
REESE F. KING and JANICE A. KING, Appellees.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. Olin W. Shinholser, Judge.
July 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the final judgment. On the issue of Appellees' recovery of the replacement cost value of their insured loss under the policy issued by Appellant, we affirm for the reasons stated in Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Rodriguez, 427 So. 3d 676 (Fla. 6th DCA 2026), and likewise certify conflict with Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Qureshi, 396 So. 3d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).
AFFIRMED.
SMITH, MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
David A. Noel and Kara Rockenbach Link, of Link & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Mark A. Nation, of The Nation Law Firm, Longwood, for Appellees.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
2