GARY LEE HAMM, II
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment and sentence following jury trial are affirmed, but the cost/fees order must be amended to correct the assessment amount from $150.00 to $100.00 to match the oral pronouncement.
[1] A scrivener's error in a cost/fees order that conflicts with the trial court's oral pronouncement may be corrected on remand to reflect the accurate amount stated during…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGary Lee Hamm, II was convicted by jury trial in Marion County Circuit Court. The trial court imposed a judgment and sentence but assessed costs of pr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GARY LEE HAMM, II,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-511 LT Case No. 2020-CF-003013-A-X
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 30, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
2
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following a jury trial. However, we remand for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $100.00 (not $150.00) for the costs of prosecution consistent with the court’s oral pronouncement.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.
WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.