JEFFREY CHARLES
v.
SHANNON WILLIAMS

Fla. 5th DCA | 2022-11-04
No. 22-0413
Tennis, J., Cohen, J., Edwards, J., Sasso, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court may only exercise jurisdiction over one of the eight orders appealed and affirms the trial court's February 10, 2022 order granting in part the Motion to Suspend Timesharing.


Headnotes

[1] An appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review orders that do not fall within its proper appellate authority, and such orders must be dismissed rather than addressed on…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Jeffrey Charles appealed eight orders from a family law case involving timesharing (custody) matters in Orange County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Sasso

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JEFFREY CHARLES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-413 LT Case No. 2013-DR-002423-O SHANNON WILLIAMS, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed November 4, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Diana M. Tennis, Judge. Jeffrey Charles, Apopka, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals eight orders, only one of which this Court may properly exercise jurisdiction over. As a result, we affirm the trial court's February 10, 2022 order to the extent it grants in part the Motion to Suspend

2 Timesharing. As to the remaining orders, this Court lacks jurisdiction, so we dismiss. AFFIRMED, in part; DISMISSED, in part. COHEN, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw