MATTHEW G. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY
v.
KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY

Fla. 5th DCA | 2022-08-09
No. 21-1987
Barbee, Jr., J., Evander, J., Cohen, J., Nardella, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Where communications and assistance are consistent with a dutiful adult child towards an aging parent, there is no presumption of undue influence.


Headnotes

[1] Dutiful conduct by an adult child toward an aging parent, including communications and assistance, does not give rise to a presumption of undue influence in estate matter…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Where communications and assistance are consistent with a 'dutiful' adult child towards an aging parent, there is no presumption of undue influence.”

Court's rationale for affirming the trial court judgment, citing Estate of Kester v. Rocco, 117 So. 3d 1196, 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)

Facts & Procedural History

Thomas R. Kennedy's estate was involved in a dispute regarding undue influence claims. Matthew G. Kennedy, as administrator ad litem of the estate, ap…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Nardella

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MATTHEW G. KENNEDY,

ADMINISTRATOR AD LITEM OF THE

ESTATE OF THOMAS R. KENNEDY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D21-1987 LT Case No. 2020-CA-208 KATHLEEN S. KENNEDY, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 9, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Don Barbee, Jr., Judge. Jeffrey A. Eisel, of Baskin Eisel Rightmyer, Clearwater, for Appellant. Clifford A. Taylor, of The Hogan Law Firm, Brooksville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

2 AFFIRMED. See Estate of Kester v. Rocco, 117 So. 3d 1196, 1200 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Where communications and assistance are consistent with a ‘dutiful’ adult child towards an aging parent, there is no presumption of undue influence.”). EVANDER, COHEN and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw