EDUARDO LINARES,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Fla. 3d DCA | 2022-08-03
No. 21-0022
Fernandez, C.J., Logue, J., Lobree, J., Fine, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court did not err in denying a motion for attorney's fees in a foreclosure case where a consent final judgment of foreclosure existed and had never been set aside.


Facts & Procedural History

Eduardo Linares appealed a trial court's denial of his motion for attorney's fees in a residential foreclosure action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. T…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Fernandez

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 3, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-22 Lower Tribunal No. 10-31265 ________________

Eduardo Linares, Appellant,

vs.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, Judge.

Robert Flavell, P.A., and Robert Flavell (Celebration), for appellant.

K&L Gates LLP, and R. Shawn Hogue, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this residential foreclosure case, Eduardo Linares appeals the trial

Affirmed.

Footnotes
2 court's denial of his motion for attorney's fees. Because, as the Appellant points out, the record contains a consent final judgment of foreclosure which has never been set aside, we find no error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw