DOUGLAS MONTGOMERY LLOYD,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A successive and repetitive motion for post-conviction relief raising the same issues previously decided must be denied.
[1] A successive and repetitive motion for post-conviction relief raising issues previously decided in prior appeals may be summarily affirmed without reexamination of those…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDouglas Montgomery Lloyd appealed the trial court's denial of his successive and repetitive motion for post-conviction relief. The court had previousl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 11, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1820 Lower Tribunal No. F98-19062A ________________
Douglas Montgomery Lloyd, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
Ana M. Davide, P.A., and Ana M. Davide, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2 Affirmed. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s successive and repetitive motion for post-conviction relief for the same reasons we had previously affirmed his appeals of similar decisions. Lloyd v. Crosby, 917 So. 2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). See also Lloyd v. McNeil, 08-21660-CIV, 2009 WL 2424576, at *5 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2009).