TIMOTHY NAKIA BOYD, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal that does not present a legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review must be summarily affirmed.
[1] Summary affirmance is appropriate when an appeal does not present a legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTimothy Nakia Boyd, Jr. appealed from the Circuit Court for Brevard County in two criminal cases.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
TIMOTHY NAKIA BOYD, JR.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-2671 LT Case Nos. 05-2019-CF-038359-A-X 05-2020-CF-019598-A-X STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 8, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Samuel Bookhardt, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. 2 AFFIRMED. See Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114, 119 (Fla. 2000) (requiring summary affirmance when appeal does not present legally dispositive issue expressly reserved for appellate review). EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and TRAVER, JJ., concur.