AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES
v.
LEIDY CASTELLANOS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant cannot challenge the evidentiary support for a trial court's judgment without providing a transcript of proceedings or an approved statement of evidence as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5).
[1] An appellant must provide a transcript of trial proceedings or a statement of evidence approved by the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”
Court explaining why it could not address whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support
Amir Rodriguez Robles appealed a final judgment of protection against stalking entered by the trial court. She failed to provide either a transcript o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stalking cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Case No. 5D21-929 AMIR RODRIGUEZ ROBLES, Appellant, v. LEIDY CASTELLANOS, Appellee. _______________________________/ Opinion filed September 24, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Christy Collins, Judge. Julio E. Gil De Lamadrid, Bayamon, Puerto Rico, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Amir Rodriguez Robles appeals a final judgment of protection against stalking entered against her. Because she failed, after given an opportunity to do so, to provide us with either a transcript of the proceedings below or a statement of evidence approved by the trial court in accordance with Florida
2 Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), we are precluded from addressing whether the trial court's order was without evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.