NICK A. SALAS
v.
RICHARD PORTANTE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed.
[1] Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), a court may summarily affirm a trial court decision when the decision is clearly correct or when the appellee fails to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNick A. Salas appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County. The appellee, Richard Portante, did no…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.315(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
NICK A. SALAS, Appellant,
v.
RICHARD PORTANTE, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1593
[September 15, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Edmond Alonzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562020CC001355.
Nick A. Salas, Stuart, pro se.
No brief filed on behalf of appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).
MAY, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.