HERMAN SHAW
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama do not apply to offenders eighteen years of age or older at the time of the offense.
[1] Graham v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHerman Shaw appealed an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion in a case originating from 1996 in Broward County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.850 cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
HERMAN SHAW, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1859
[September 1, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-023020CF10A.
Herman Shaw, Avon Park, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), do not apply to offenders eighteen years of age or older at the time of the offense. Jean-Michel v. State, 96 So. 3d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (U.S. 2012)
- Smith v. State, 96 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)