JONATHAN LABRADA,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant cannot succeed on an argument that has already been rejected by both the trial court and the appellate court in a prior proceeding.
Jonathan Labrada appealed from a circuit court decision in Miami-Dade County involving two lower tribunal case numbers. The appellant raised the same …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Appellate Procedure 9.141(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 29, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-566 Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-14466 & F06-23887 ________________
Jonathan Labrada, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.
O’Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2
The trial court and this Court have previously rejected the exact same argument Appellant is now making. Labrada v. State, 261 So. 3d 537 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (table).
Affirmed.