ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. A/A/O EMILY HANSEN
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A chiropractic provider is entitled to recover the reasonable and necessary charges for services rendered to an insured, as established by controlling precedent in Geico Indemnity Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A.
Royal Palm Chiropractic & Rehab Center sought payment from Government Employees Insurance Company for chiropractic services provided to Emily Hansen. …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Claim Denial cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
ROYAL PALM CHIROPRACTIC & REHAB CENTER, P.A. a/a/o EMILY HANSEN, Appellant,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D21-148
[July 14, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteen Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 50-2017-SC- 009430-XXXX-MB and 50-2019-AP-000085-CAXX-MB.
Jonathan Phillips of Florida Litigators, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Michael A. Rosenberg, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz- Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Based on our decision in Geico Indemnity Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A., No. 4D21-457, 2021 WL 2584107 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021), we reverse the final judgment in favor of Geico and remand for the entry of a final judgment in favor of appellant in the amount of $1.22.
Reversed and remanded.
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.