GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
v.
ROYAL PALM BEACH REHAB CORP. A/A/P NICOLE HALEY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of Royal Palm Beach Rehab Corporation was affirmed.
GEICO Indemnity Company appealed a decision from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County involving Royal Palm Beach Re…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Per Curiam Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. ROYAL PALM BEACH REHAB CORPORATION a/a/o NICOLE HALEY, Appellee.
No. 4D21-201
[June 30, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John D. Fry, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CONO17-008112 and
CACE19-022901.
Michael A. Rosenberg, Peter D. Weinstein and Thomas L. Hunker of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
Chad A. Barr and Dalton L. Gray of the Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic, P.A., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1513a, 2021 WL 2584107 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).
CIKLIN, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.