IN RE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1962 REVISION
Appended to this order is a complete compilation of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and all amendments, revisions or additions which have been made since July 1, 1957, adopted pursuant to the power vested in this Court by Article V of the Florida Constitution. This compilation and revision shall govern all proceedings within the scope of these rules after midnight September 30, 1962. This compilation and revision shall supersede all conflicting rules and statutes. All statutes not superseded hereby or in conflict herewith shall remain in effect as rules promulgated by the Supreme Court.
Adopted and approved by the Court en banc June 18th, 1962.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bain v. State, 730 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…some of the reform sought by the legislature could be accomplished if trial counsel in criminal cases were required to allege with some specificity in the notice of appeal the error sought to be reviewed on appeal. Cf. In re Florida Appellate Rules, 142 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 1962) (requiring assignments of error under the pre-1978 rules). Especially in appeals from guilty pleas and pleas of nolo con-tendere, this might allow appellate courts to dismiss non-meritorious appeals near their inception. See Counts v. St…
-
Evans v. Hydeman, 168 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)…as by comparison of it with the federal rule. Evans urges that Rule 1.38(b) could not be utilized here, since the case was long pending before October 1, 1962, which he claims was the effective date established by the order of the supreme court in 142 So. 2d 725, said by him to have superseded the order reported in 139 So. 2d 129, relied upon by plaintiffs. An added contention is that plaintiffs did not invoke the rule. Further, Evans states that the rule is not self-executing, and the judge of the lower co…