MILAGROS RODRIGUEZ,
v.
ALBERTO CARVALHO, ET AL.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order is affirmed because appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.
Milagros Rodriguez appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The case involved Rodriguez as appellant against Alberto Carvalho a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Affirmance cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-790 Lower Tribunal No. 19-36897 ________________
Milagros Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
Alberto Carvalho, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, Judge.
Milagros Rodriguez, in proper person.
Walter J. Harvey, School Board Attorney, and Jeff James, Assistant School Board Attorney, for appellees.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
2 Upon consideration of the initial brief and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).
Appellant’s motion to strike and Appellee’s motion to strike are hereby deemed moot. Affirmed.