IN RE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES 1962 REVISION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court promulgates a compilation of Florida Appellate Rules and amendments, effective October 1, 1962, superseding conflicting rules and statutes.
The Court is appending a compilation of Florida Appellate Rules and all amendments, revisions, or additions made since July 1, 1957. This compilation …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rules Of Appellate Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
Appended to this order is a complete compilation of the Florida Appellate Rules and all amendments, 31 F.S.A., revisions or additions which have been made since July 1, 1957, adopted pursuant to the power vested in this Court by Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. This compilation and revision shall govern all appellate proceedings in the Supreme Court, district courts of appeal and circuit courts after midnight, September 30, 1962. This compilation and revision shall supersede all conflicting rules and statutes. All statutes not superseded hereby or in conflict herewith shall remain in effect as rules promulgated by the Supreme Court.
Rule 2.2 relating to district courts of appeal is included in this compilation and revision for the convenience of the Bench and Bar and contains, according to information furnished this Court by the district courts of appeal, all amendments, revisions or additions since July 1, 1957. Such por*725tions of Rule 2.2 as are within the jurisdiction of this Court to enact or approve are hereby approved and promulgated.
Adopted and approved by the Court en banc June 18th, 1962.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Brown, 330 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…in a criminal proceeding is not authorized. The state’s ore tenus motion for common law certiorari is denied. Appellee’s motion to quash this appeal is granted. MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur. . Also see In Re Florida Appellate Rules 1962 Revision, 142 So. 2d 724 (Fla.1962), wherein the Supreme Court stated: “All statutes not superseded hereby or in conflict herewith shall remain in effect as rules promulgated by the Supreme Court.”…