IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.142 (A)
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142(a) is amended to eliminate comparative proportionality review from the scope of appellate review in death penalty cases.
[1] The Florida Constitution's conformity clause prohibits appellate courts from conducting comparative proportionality review of death sentences in the absence of a statute…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“forbids this Court from analyzing death sentences for comparative proportionality in the absence of a statute establishing that review”
The Court's holding in Lawrence v. State regarding the Florida Constitution's conformity clause
The Florida Supreme Court previously held in Lawrence v. State that the Florida Constitution's conformity clause forbids comparative proportionality r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC20-1653 ____________
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.142(a).
January 14, 2021
PER CURIAM.
The Court, on its own motion,1 amends Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.142(a) (Procedure in Death Penalty Appeals) to remove reference to comparative proportionality review. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. In Lawrence v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S277 (Fla. Oct. 29, 2020), this Court held that the Florida Constitution’s conformity clause “forbids this Court from analyzing death sentences for comparative proportionality in the absence of a statute establishing that review.” Id. at S277. In so holding, we receded from Yacob v. State, 136 So. 3d 539 (Fla. 2014), and “eliminate[d] comparative
1. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(d).
proportionality review from the scope of our appellate review set forth in rule 9.142(a)(5).” 45 Fla. L. Weekly at S279. Accordingly, consistent with our decision in Lawrence, rule 9.142(a) is amended as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendment shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion. It is so ordered. CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., dissents with an opinion.
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AMENDMENT.
LABARGA, J., dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in my dissent in Lawrence v. State, 45 Fla. L. Weekly S277 (Fla. Oct. 29, 2020), I dissent to the removal of proportionality review from the rule governing our procedure in death penalty appeals. Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
APPENDIX
RULE 9.142
PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW IN DEATH PENALTY
CASES
(a) Procedure in Death Penalty Appeals.
(1) – (4) [No Change] (5) Scope of Review. On direct appeal in death penalty cases, whether or not insufficiency of the evidence or proportionality is an issue presented for review, the court shall review these issues and, if necessary, remand for the appropriate relief.
(b) – (d) [No Change]