CHRISTOPHER RAND LAKE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Probation revocation orders are affirmed, but remanded for correction of scrivener's errors reflecting three violations when the appellant admitted to only two condition 5 violations.
[1] A discrepancy between the number of probation violations admitted by a defendant and the number reflected in the revocation order constitutes a scrivener's error subject…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChristopher Rand Lake's probation was revoked in three separate cases following his admission to two condition 5 violations. The trial court's orders,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CHRISTOPHER RAND LAKE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-823
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 18, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
HARRIS, J.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences imposed by the trial court following the revocation of Appellant’s probation in three separate cases. However, while Appellant admitted to two condition 5 violations, the orders revoking
We affirm the orders of violation of probation but remand for correction of the orders consistent with this opinion.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors.
EVANDER, C.J., and TRAVER, J., concur.