VERNON ROLLE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied Rolle's Rule 3.800 motion challenging the application of the prison releasee reoffender statute to his sentence.
[1] An affirmance of a trial court's denial of a Rule 3.800 motion does not preclude a defendant from challenging the application of the prison releasee reoffender statute in…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“affirmance does not preclude challenge to the application of the prison releasee reoffender statute in any future case in which the State seeks to apply it”
The court's citation to Casiano v. State, 280 So. 3d 105, 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)
Vernon Lorenzo Rolle appealed an order denying his Rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
VERNON LORENZO ROLLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-1785
[December 16, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 1998-CF-002853 A.
Vernon Lorenzo Rolle, Columbus, Georgia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Casiano v. State, 280 So. 3d 105, 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (affirmance does not preclude challenge to the application of the prison releasee reoffender statute in any future case in which the State seeks to apply it).
LEVINE, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *