MATTHEW M. VANDEPOL
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AND MELANIE ANNE HILL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Department of Revenue's child support enforcement decision is affirmed without prejudice, preserving the appellant's right to seek relief under section 409.2563, Florida Statutes.
[1] An administrative decision in a child support enforcement matter may be affirmed without prejudice to allow the appellant to pursue relief under section 409.2563, Florida…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMatthew M. Vandepol appealed a decision by the Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Program regarding a child support matter.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Enforcement cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MATTHEW M. VANDEPOL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT
PROGRAM, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3867
[November 4, 2020]
Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue; L.T. Case No. 2001300393.
Matthew M. Vandepol, Lake Park, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement, Tallahassee, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice for appellant to seek relief as outlined in section 409.2563, Florida Statutes (2019).
CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.