JOHN MOORE
v.
LISA MOORE N/K/A LISA COLEMAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in the domestic relations case is affirmed.
[1] Trial courts should enter final judgments in domestic relations cases involving alimony modification within a reasonable time following the conclusion of trial, and a del…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA trial in a domestic relations case began on March 14, 2018, and concluded on October 11, 2018. The case involved competing requests for modification…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Domestic Relations cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JOHN MOORE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-3314
LISA MOORE N/K/A LISA COLEMAN ,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed October 2, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Michael J. Rudisill, Judge.
Cynthia M. Winter, and Eric Lee Bensen, of Greater Orlando Family Law, Winter Park, for Appellant.
Andrew Joseph Chmelir, of Jacobson, Chmelir & Ferwerda, Winter Springs, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LAMBERT and HARRIS, JJ., concur. COHEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.
2
CASE NO. 19-3314
COHEN, J., concurring specially.
The trial in this domestic relations case began on March 14, 2018, and concluded on October 11, 2018. A supplemental final judgment was not entered until October 10, 2019, a year to the day after the conclusion of the trial. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.215(f); Saboff v. Saboff, 275 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). This was not an overly complex case. The issues primarily dealt with competing requests for modification of alimony. The parties deserved a timelier ruling.