DANIELLE S. WILLIAMSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The sentence imposed following probation revocation is affirmed, with ineffective assistance of counsel claims preserved for post-conviction relief.
[1] Ineffective assistance of counsel claims arising from probation revocation proceedings may be preserved for consideration in a timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Proce…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“our affirmance is without prejudice to Williamson raising that issue in a timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion”
The court's treatment of ineffective assistance of counsel claims
Danielle Williamson's probation was revoked and she was sentenced by the Circuit Court for Charlotte County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
DANIELLE S. WILLIAMSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-3481 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 18, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; George Richards, Judge. Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Danielle Williamson appeals from the sentence imposed following the revocation of her probation. We affirm in all respects without comment. With regard to
Williamson's claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance, our affirmance is without prejudice to Williamson raising that issue in a timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. See McClough v. State, 74 So. 3d 158, 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Affirmed. CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.