POMPANO AUTOMOTIVE ASSOCIATES LLC D/B/A CHRYSLER JEEP OF NORTH BROWARD
v.
JASON HORGAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the trial court's nonfinal order without prejudice to the appellant's right to enforce outstanding sanctions for discovery violations and seek further sanctions for prejudice caused by the appellee's delay.
[1] A party may enforce outstanding sanctions for discovery violations and seek additional sanctions for prejudice caused by an opposing party's delay in moving to reopen a c…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case involves a dispute between Pompano Automotive Associates LLC and Jason Horgan. The trial court had previously imposed sanctions on the appel…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Non-Final Order Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
POMPANO AUTOMOTIVE ASSOCIATES LLC d/b/a CHRYSLER JEEP OF NORTH BROWARD, Appellant,
v.
JASON HORGAN, Appellee.
No. 4D19-3597
[August 12, 2020]
Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carol-Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14-13212.
Kenneth L. Paretti of Quinton & Paretti, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Michael T. Ross of Law Office of Michael T. Ross, P.A., Hollywood, and Lourdes E. Ferrer of Ferrer Law Group, PLLC, Weston, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm without prejudice to Appellant enforcing the outstanding sanctions order for discovery violations before the trial court and seeking further sanctions for the prejudice caused by Appellee’s delay in moving to “reopen” the case.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *