DAVID P. MORAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A court may sanction a pro se litigant for abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings by barring future pro se filings and referring the matter to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may warn a pro se litigant that continued filing of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous petitions may result in sanctions including a bar on pro se filin…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner David P. Moran filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-006177-A-OR. The court…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
DAVID P. MORAN,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D20-1177
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed June 19, 2020.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
David P. Moran, Lake City, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-006177-A-OR. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2016-CF-006177-A-OR may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). EDWARDS, GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.