GRACE MCDADE-HICKS, SURVIVING SPOUSE OF RICKY BERNARD HICKS (DECEASED)
v.
VICTORIA A. HICKS AND GREGORY B. HICKS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellant who fails to preserve an issue at trial cannot raise it on appeal, and appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review administrative orders assigning cases to county courts.
[1] An issue not preserved at trial cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.
[2] Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review administrative orders that assign cases to county courts.
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGrace McDade-Hicks, the surviving spouse of Ricky Bernard Hicks, appealed a circuit court order determining the homestead status of real property. She…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse County Court Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GRACE McDADE-HICKS,
SURVIVING SPOUSE OF
RICKY BERNARD HICKS (DECEASED),
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-1239
VICTORIA A. HICKS AND GREGORY B. HICKS,
Appellees.
______________________________________/
Opinion filed June 12, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, David E. Silverman, Judge.
Jennifer L. Kerkhoff and Amy Romaine, of A.M. Romaine, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Grace McDade-Hicks appeals the order Determining Homestead Status of Real Property, arguing that the lower court erred because it improperly disposed of the property when the deceased's intent was clear. In addition, she argues the county court did not have jurisdiction to enter the order because it exceeded the scope of the administrative order that assigned the case to the county court. First, because McDade-Hicks failed to
COHEN, WALLIS, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Aills v. Luciano Boemi, M.D., 29 So. 3d 1105 (Fla. 2010)
- The Honorable Joe A. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1996)
- Thweatt v. State, 861 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)