TERANO FINANCIAL, LLC
v.
FRANCIS C. BISCHOFF AND FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review a nonfinal order denying a motion to quash service of process when the trial court has not made a determination regarding personal jurisdiction.
[1] An order denying a motion to quash service of process is nonfinal and not appealable when the trial court has not made a determination regarding personal jurisdiction ove…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTerano Financial, LLC appealed a trial court order denying its motion to quash service of process in a case involving Freedom Mortgage Corporation. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Service cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
TERANO FINANCIAL, LLC,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2856
FRANCIS C. BISCHOFF AND
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Appellees.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 29, 2020
Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Chad K. Alvaro, Judge.
Gregory Bryl, Sunny Isles Beach, and Jacob A. Brainard, and Candice J. Hart, of Hart Law and Title LLC, Coral Springs, for Appellant.
Robert R. Edwards, of Choice Legal Group, PA, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellee Freedom Mortgage Corporation. No Appearance for Other Appellee.
HARRIS, J.
Terano Financial, LLC (“Terano”) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to quash service of process in favor of Freedom Mortgage Corporation. Because the trial court never made a determination with respect to personal jurisdiction over Terano, this
2
Court is without jurisdiction to review the nonfinal order denying Terano’s motion to quash constructive service. See Archer v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 220 So. 3d 477, 478–79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).
DISMISSED.
GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.