DEXTER JACKSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who engages in a pattern of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings attacking his judgment and sentence may be prohibited from future pro se filings in that matter to conserve judicial resources.
[1] A pro se litigant may be prohibited from filing further petitions concerning a specific case when the litigant engages in a pattern of abusive, repetitive, malicious, or…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
Court's citation to Isley v. State in support of imposing sanctions against repetitive pro se filings.
Dexter Jackson, a pro se litigant incarcerated at Raiford, filed multiple abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings attacking his judgment …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Abusive Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
DEXTER JACKSON,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D20-661
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed May 22, 2020
Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Raul A. Zambrano, Judge.
Dexter Jackson, Raiford, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Volusia County Circuit Court Case No. 1996-32289-CFAES, this court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)