ANDREW TURPENNING
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A $12 cost assessment under section 318.18, Florida Statutes, must be struck from the order for costs when the defendant was not convicted of an offense to which the cost applies.
[1] A cost assessment under section 318.18, Florida Statutes, may only be imposed when the defendant is convicted of an offense to which that cost applies.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAndrew Turpenning appealed his conviction and sentence from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. The trial court assessed a $12 cost pursuant to sect…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ANDREW TURPENNING,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D19-2094
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 22, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Jeffrey Mahl, Judge.
Andrew Turpenning, Milton, pro se.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Andrew Turpenning’s conviction and sentence. We remand for the trial court to strike from the order for costs the $12 assessed pursuant
2 to section 318.18, Florida Statutes (2019), because Turpenning was not convicted of an offense to which this cost applies. See Sorenson v. State, 291 So. 3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020); Ayos v. State, 275 So. 3d 178, 182 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
ORFINGER, GROSSHANS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Poole v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2021)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Merriex v. State, 210 So. 3d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
- Sorenson v. State, 291 So. 3d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)