WILLIAM ANTHONY IANNI
v.
DARIA ANN IANNI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must consider a former husband's mortgage payments on the marital home during the pendency of a dissolution action when determining his retroactive child support obligation.
[1] A trial court must consider a former spouse's mortgage payments on the marital home made during the pendency of a dissolution action when calculating retroactive child su…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“former husband's mortgage payments on parties' marital home during course of marital dissolution action were required to be considered when determining retroactive child support obligation”
Court's explanation of the error in the trial court's child support calculation, citing Johnson v. Johnson, 268 So. 3d 203, 205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
William Ianni appealed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered by the trial court. The trial court determined Ianni's retroactive child su…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Child Support Calculation cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM ANTHONY IANNI,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-3082
DARIA ANN IANNI,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed May 8, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, George B. Turner, Judge.
Mark S. Peters, of Eisenmenger, Blaue & Peters, P.A., Viera, for Appellant.
Maureen Monaghan Matheson, of Matheson Appellate Law, P.A., Satellite Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
William Ianni (“former husband”) appeals the entry of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We reverse as to one issue, but otherwise affirm. In determining former husband’s retroactive child support obligation, the trial court erred in failing to consider the mortgage payments paid by former husband during the pendency of the litigation. See Johnson v. Johnson, 268 So. 3d 203, 205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (holding that former
2 husband’s mortgage payments on parties’ marital home during course of marital dissolution action were required to be considered when determining retroactive child support obligation).
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
EVANDER, C.J., EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.